\"/updatesetup\" and \"/update\" coupling
Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 3:54 pm
I noticed that there is a direct coupling between running "/update" and "/updatesetup": specifically one MUST run "/updatesetup" before running any "/updates".
This seems like an unnecessary dependency. Some of our clients dont care about the windows task but do want to have the ability to run the "/update" script from the start menu.
How can I make these two steps independent? Basically, right after the install I want the clients to be able to run "/update" right away, whether or not windows update task has been set up.
On a related note, as far as setting up the windows update task - what was Installaware's rationale for forcing the user to run "/updatesetup" as an INDEPENDENT step? Wouldn't it make more sense to run "/updatesetup" automatically as the last step of the install process? or is there some technical reason/philosophy why it cant/shouldn't be done?
thanks,
alex
This seems like an unnecessary dependency. Some of our clients dont care about the windows task but do want to have the ability to run the "/update" script from the start menu.
How can I make these two steps independent? Basically, right after the install I want the clients to be able to run "/update" right away, whether or not windows update task has been set up.
On a related note, as far as setting up the windows update task - what was Installaware's rationale for forcing the user to run "/updatesetup" as an INDEPENDENT step? Wouldn't it make more sense to run "/updatesetup" automatically as the last step of the install process? or is there some technical reason/philosophy why it cant/shouldn't be done?
thanks,
alex